POLOTNO SDK VS FABRIC.JS

Polotno SDK vs Fabric.js – schema editor vs canvas framework

Developer comparison of Polotno SDK and Fabric.js across purpose, integration, automation, rendering, features, industries, and pricing.

POLOTNO SDK VS FABRIC.JS

Polotno SDK vs Fabric.js – schema editor vs canvas framework

Developer comparison of Polotno SDK and Fabric.js across purpose, integration, automation, rendering, features, industries, and pricing.

POLOTNO SDK VS FABRIC.JS

Polotno SDK vs Fabric.js – schema editor vs canvas framework

Developer comparison of Polotno SDK and Fabric.js across purpose, integration, automation, rendering, features, industries, and pricing.

Polotno SDK embeds a full editor with a JSON schema; Fabric.js is a canvas framework for building drawing tools. Use Polotno when you want an in‑product editor with automation and export. Use Fabric.js when you want to assemble your own editor from canvas primitives.

Core philosophy

Polotno SDK is about shipping an editor quickly and unifying manual editing with automation in one schema. Rendering can run in the browser, on your servers, or via the Polotno Cloud Render API. Plans are on Request API key.

Fabric.js is about flexible canvas abstractions; the editor, templates, automation, and export are up to you.

Architecture and integration

Polotno SDK integrates as a browser editor with configurable UI and assets. Rendering paths are interchangeable under one schema: browser, self‑hosted, or cloud. For element control, see the video element, image element, and text element.

Fabric.js integrates as a rendering and interaction layer that you compose into an editor if needed.

Automation and templating

Polotno SDK exposes elements in JSON for code‑driven generation, variable mapping, and reusable templates.

Fabric.js provides objects and events; templating and automation require custom code.

Rendering and export

Polotno SDK supports PNG, JPEG, PDF, PPTX, GIF, and MP4, and can render in‑browser, self‑hosted, or via Cloud Render; see import and export for formats.

Fabric.js renders in the browser; server‑side rendering and video require additional systems.

Feature scope

Polotno SDK

  • Editor UI, templates, timeline, animation

  • Multi‑format export and flexible rendering

Fabric.js

  • Canvas objects, transforms, serialization helpers

  • No built‑in editor UI, templates, or export service

Use cases

Polotno SDK

  • SaaS and MarTech: ship an editor and automate assets

  • eCommerce: catalog‑driven visuals and short video ads

  • Social/content: post and story editors

  • Education: slides and worksheets

  • Real estate/print/DAM: documents and print assets

Fabric.js

  • Build bespoke editors or visualization tools when you need full control

Feature comparison

Capability

Polotno SDK

Fabric.js

Primary model

Embeddable editor + JSON schema

Canvas framework

Editor inside your app

Yes (customizable UI)

No (you build it)

Automation

Programmatic via schema and code

Custom implementation

Rendering modes

Browser, self‑hosted, cloud

Browser canvas

Pricing and licensing

Polotno SDK

Team $199/mo for organizations under 10 employees, one domain, 10,000 editor loads. Business $399/mo for organizations under 50 employees, unlimited domains and loads. Enterprise $599+/mo with custom terms and optional source access. Cloud rendering: $0.004 per image, $0.03 per video minute. See Request API key.

Fabric.js

Open‑source; commercial features and export pipelines are custom.

Conclusion

Polotno SDK delivers an editor and schema‑based automation with flexible rendering. Fabric.js offers a canvas foundation when you want to craft the entire editor yourself.

More comparisons

Connect, configure and preview